I believe in public education

I first want to thank all of the math blogger initiation folks (Julie, Fawn, Anne, Megan, Bowman, Sam, Lisa, John, @druinok, Tina, Kate, Sue) that started this whole thing.  You've gotten so many more math teachers to start blogging and that's only going to make us better math teachers.  It's exactly why I'm in this, and I wanted to say thank you!

I haven't posted in about two weeks, (another math teacher at my school and I are splitting the duties on this blog) and I'm not going to write about one of the suggested topics for this fourth and final week of the blogger initiation.  Instead I'm going to talk about this hot button issue that I'm currently in, the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) strike.  There are some rules for this post though that I want to make clear.  First, I'm not going to talk about unions because either people hate them, or support them and I don't want start a never ending argument.  I'm also not going to get into whether or not teachers deserve better or if they are being made out to be the bad guys.  Look, we all chose our respective professions and we all have our opinions.  However, we don't really know how someone else's job is unless we've actually worked it.  I definitely think that we don't do enough research and reading on our own to get all the facts whether it is with politics, business, or education to issue some of the statements that we do.  What I am going to talk about is something I believe in very strongly: public education.

(Note: I've linked most of the facts here with articles.  Check them out for more background knowledge.  I didn't want to make this post extremely long.)

The CTU has been on strike for two days now.  We as teachers have been picketing at our respective schools in the morning, and rallying downtown Chicago in the afternoons.  Let me say, it's been a very strange and interesting experience.  The media has concentrated their reports on teacher compensation, which is currently 1st or 2nd to NYC teachers, depending how you do the math, and the city says they are offering a 3% raise the first year and 2% for the next three years, which the city is saying equates to a 16% raise.  Again, not sure who did the math on that.  We've already started teaching a longer school day, and Rahm Emanuel promised compensation but took it away despite an independent arbitrator deciding that we should get paid 35.7% over four years.  BUT!  Let me say that this is not about the money.  The compensation is such a small portion of this.  Also, the entire country is experiencing tough economic times and there are so many people out there looking for work, or working extremely hard just to get by and I definitely feel guilty in some ways having that issue on the table.

Let's get to the real issues.  Our recently elected mayor is busy imposing his own agendas throughout the city. (Oh and BTW he was running a super-pac up until yesterday while also running the third largest city in the country. PRIORITIES!!)  He's politicized the changes that he's wanted to impose on Chicago's schools, and he says that it's for the students.  The truth is that he doesn't believe in public education.  He wants larger class sizes so he doesn't have to hire more teachers.  He wants to create a privatized school system in the way of charter schools.  He says that charter schools are the way to go, but the charter schools in Chicago are actually doing worse than Chicago Public Schools.  The real reason why he likes charter schools so much is because they are cheaper.  Teacher turnover in charter schools is extremely high, thus giving them lower overhead costs for teachers.  He's not trying to create better schools for Chicago's children, he wants a smaller budget line in his budget.  Can you imagine a public school system where the teachers have one, two, MAYBE three years of experience?  I'm just starting my fourth year of teaching and I feel that I have so much more to learn and it's still a struggle despite receiving high ratings from my principal last year.  Plus, if Rahm really believed in public education then why does he send his children to private schools?  The way I see it, if we don't invest in public education and provide a quality learning experience for ALL children, then our country will suffer.  There are so many benefits and positive outcomes the more education and learning people pursue.  I really think that serious problems we have in this country like poverty, crime and health care costs would improve if we invested in public education.  However, if Rahm has his way and failing charter schools are the norm, parents will be forced to send their kids to private schools.  They'll pay twice, once on their taxes for the failing charter schools and then again for tuition to private schools.  I don't want to have to send my future children to private schools.

I'm a product of public schools.  Public education works.  I'm fighting for public education.  Why not join me and wear red if you support public education!